Co-Creation Workshops


Project maintained by Design4Good Hosted on GitHub Pages — Theme by mattgraham

Are coping strategies in Islamic countries applicable in Gaza?

Question: Are strategies to cope with death and bombing in Islamic countries applicable in Gaza since October 2023?

Answer: Answering applicability requires careful consideration of both shared cultural-religious frameworks and Gaza's unique challenges

Here's a structured analysis:

Applicable Strategies

  1. Religious and Cultural Resilience:

    • Faith-Based Coping: Islamic principles like sabr (patience), trust in divine will (tawakkul), and communal prayers are deeply rooted in Gazan society. These can provide psychological solace and communal bonding during trauma.
    • Community Solidarity: The concept of ummah (global Muslim community) and local kinship networks can foster collective resilience, as seen in other conflicts (e.g., Syria, Yemen). Shared mourning rituals and communal support for orphans/widows align with Islamic traditions.
  2. Community-Led Initiatives:

    • Local NGOs and Mosques: Grassroots organizations and religious leaders often act as first responders, offering material aid and spiritual guidance—similar to roles in Afghanistan or Iraq.
    • Informal Education and Trauma Support: Community-led mental health initiatives, including storytelling or art therapy for children, mirror efforts in other conflict zones, though scaled to Gaza’s constraints.
  3. Psychological Frameworks:

    • Adapted Trauma Care: Simplified, culturally sensitive counseling (e.g., integrating Islamic narratives of hope) has been effective elsewhere and could be replicated if resources allow.

Challenges and Limitations

  1. Resource Scarcity:

    • Gaza’s blockade and infrastructure destruction limit access to basic needs (food, water, healthcare), overshadowing psychosocial interventions. Strategies relying on external aid (e.g., shelters, trauma clinics) face severe bottlenecks.
  2. Chronic Crisis Conditions:

    • Prolonged exposure to violence (16-year blockade, recurring wars) may erode resilience mechanisms. Unlike short-term conflicts, chronic stress complicates recovery, necessitating long-term strategies currently unfeasible under siege.
  3. Political and Logistical Barriers:

    • Restrictions on movement impede external aid and expertise. Local authorities (e.g., Hamas) and international actors (e.g., UNRWA) operate under constraints, affecting structured interventions.
  4. Child-Specific Needs:

    • Over 40% of Gazans are under 14. Schools and safe spaces are often bombed, hindering child-focused strategies (e.g., play therapy) that require stable environments.

Adaptations for Gaza

Conclusion

While core Islamic and conflict-tested strategies (faith, community solidarity) are applicable, Gaza’s extreme resource limitations and political realities demand urgent adaptation and international advocacy. Success hinges on addressing immediate survival needs while nurturing culturally grounded resilience. Without systemic changes to access and security, even robust strategies will face diminished efficacy.


Home